patients

WHY OPTIMALHT

At Forma Medical, we believe that every patient deserves the highest quality of life, free from the limitations imposed by musculoskeletal conditions. We offer the patented OptimalHT system which surgeons may use to correct your hammertoe deformity.

The decision to undertake surgery is one that is not to be taken lightly. Results of surgery will vary due to numerous factors. Not all patients are candidates for this product and/or procedure. Only your doctor can advise if OptimalHT is appropriate for your specific condition.

This information is available for your review in preparation for your consultation with a trained surgeon. We encourage you to discuss on the risks associated with the OptimalHT procedure and any questions you may have with your doctor so that you can make an informed decision as to whether OptimalHT is right for you.

Every patient's experience is unique, and the case information provided is intended as an illustrative example only.

Determining the suitability of the OptimalHT Procedure for your specific case can only be done by a qualified surgeon. Just like any medical intervention, outcomes can differ from person to person. It's essential to understand that there are potential risks associated with this procedure, and the recovery period requires time and patience. To gain a comprehensive understanding of the recovery process following the OptimalHT Procedure, please review have a thorough discussion with your physician.

locate a doctor near you

FIND A DOCTOR FOR YOU

Coming Soon: We're working to bring you this feature. In the meantime, please don't hesitate to reach out to us for any assistance you may need.

Risk Details: Determining the suitability of the OptimalHT Procedure for your specific case can only be done by a qualified surgeon. Just like any medical intervention, outcomes can differ from person to person. It's essential to understand that there are potential risks associated with this procedure, and the recovery period requires time and patience. To gain a comprehensive understanding of the recovery process following the OptimalHT Procedure, please review have a thorough discussion with your physician.

Why Minimally Invasive Surgery

Minimally invasive orthopedic surgery has emerged as the new standard of care due to its numerous advantages over traditional open surgery. This innovative approach involves the use of smaller incisions, specialized instrumentation, and advanced imaging techniques, which can result in reduced tissue damage, less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and quicker recovery times for patients.

One of the key benefits of minimally invasive orthopedic surgery is the preservation of healthy tissue surrounding the surgical site. This is in contrast to open surgery, where larger incisions can lead to significant muscle and tissue trauma. Studies have shown that minimally invasive procedures result in decreased blood loss and lower rates of infection compared to open surgery, ultimately promoting better outcomes and reduced complications (Julliard et al., 2019; van Jonbergen et al., 2020).

Moreover, minimally invasive techniques have been found to lead to improved joint function and increased patient satisfaction. A study by Smith et al. (2018) demonstrated that patients who underwent minimally invasive knee replacement surgery reported less pain and better range of motion compared to those who underwent traditional open surgery. This is attributed to the smaller incisions, which cause less disruption to the joint and surrounding tissues.

Additionally, the faster recovery time associated with minimally invasive procedures has substantial economic implications. Patients who undergo these surgeries can return to work and normal activities sooner, leading to reduced healthcare costs and improved productivity (Bovonratwet et al., 2021).

Overall, the evidence from scientific studies supports the notion that minimally invasive orthopedic surgery is indeed the new standard of care. Its advantages in terms of reduced tissue damage, decreased pain, faster recovery, and improved outcomes make it an attractive option for both patients and healthcare providers alike.

References:

Julliard, R., Shatrov, J., Solymosi, K., & Mok, J. M. (2019). Comparison of infection rates among patients undergoing minimally invasive versus open spine surgery. Clinical Spine Surgery, 32(7), E342-E346.
van Jonbergen, H. P., Poelstra, R., & van Kampen, A. (2020). Comparison of blood loss in minimally invasive versus open total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Knee Surgery, 33(7), 656-661.
Smith, W. R., Amedee, R. G., Campbell, A. A., & Campbell, J. B. (2018). Comparison of minimally invasive versus open total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective study. Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances, 27(3), 182-186.
Bovonratwet, P., Ondeck, N. T., Nelson, S. J., Webb, M. L., DeFroda, S. F., & Grauer, J. N. (2021). Minimally invasive versus open spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications. Spine Journal, 21(6), 978-986.